Marketing for Actuaries (LIMRA) - Chapter VII - ILLUSTRATION AND DISCLOSURE
Competition
- consumer level - competing against otehr cos w/ similar products
- distribution level - compete for agents or other sales sources
- inter-industry competition - consumer savings and retirement dollars
- mainly focused on price comptetition adn disclosure regs
- price comparison - measures relative attractiveness of pols avail from diff cos
- policy benefit disclosure - informing prospects of structure of policy offered
- prems, CVs divs, options and supp benfits
- life ins is usually "sold" instead of "bought" - different from most consumer products
Cost Index for Price Comparison
- old std basis - net cost = sum prems for 20 years - 20 yr CV - illustrated divs
- 70s - suggesting int adj cost index
- slow acceptance b/c
- controversy over choice of new cost comparison system
- apprehension that emphasizing comparative costs might hampter selling and discourage prospects from buying
- failure to sufficiently recognize risks of buying needed coverage
- failure to sufficiently recognize the risks of delay
- feds started looking @ alternate indexes and spurred cos to react
- ind adj finally adopted by NAIC in 76
- myth: cost alone is basic comparison factor among ins products - int adj method perpetuates this
- doesn't help buyers assess appropriateness of product to their needs
- consumerists often forget that one of the benfeits for buyer is education and services of a professional agent
- efforts to improve quality and availability of comparative info ineffectove for several reasons
- failure by industry leaders (and actuaries) to recognize delay may lead to widespread buyer rejection of ins
- problems in comparing dissimilar policies - policy types adn company philosophies (new money vs portfolio)
- agent's ability to vary illustrations - esp int racditing rates
- actuaries who confuse illustrations w/ projections and reject any form of comparative analysis
- regulators and regulations that have not kept pace w/ products
Illustrations as Method of Comparison
- historically used to show effects of dividends
- b/c of external copetition, began using illustrations to show inner workings as comparison to external products
- tech alloed agents to produce illustrations on the fly
- if done on a consistent basis, illustrations provide valid comparison
- abuse of illustrations have caused may problems
Illustration Model Reg and ASOP 24
- NAIC working group indentified # of computer illustration problems
- inappropriate use of illustrations to estimate future performance and compare policies
- lack of accountability of any of the parties to the sale
- lack of standardized format fo rlife ins illustrations
- lask of std and consistent definitions, lang, assumptions adn methodology
- inadequate description of the policy
- consumers not notified of changes in current assumptions
- insufficient penalty provisions exist for disclosure violations
- current regulatory approaches out-of-date considering desings of poliices being sold today
- NAIC Life Ins Illustration Model Reg - app 1995
- provided for protection of consumers
- fostered consumer education by making illustrations understanbable
- provided illustration formats
- prescribed standards
- req'd disclosure in connection w/ illustrations
- created illustration actuary
- Illustration Actuary - certifies illustratoin based on ASB standards
- ASOP 24 provides guidance
- "Illustrated Scale" must be supportable (disciplined current scale)
- to appease regulators concerns over "bait and switch" scales (non-guar elements)
SelfSupport Test
- policy form should not be supported by another policy form or another source
- accumulated value of policy CF using disciplined current scale and underlying assumptions s/b >= illustrated PO valued for 15th anniv and every illustrated point beyond
Lapse-Supported Test
- req prohibits illustration of non-guar elements in poliicies deemed lapse supported
- req degined lapse-support test - used disciplined scale assumptions except years 6+ assume 100% persistency
- intended to insure that any persistency bonuses included in test
Illustration Assumptions
- disciplined current scale assumptions s/b based on actual experience to extent experience is current, determinable, and credible
- otherwise use actual exp/trens of similar blocks from
- same co
- other co
- other sources
- in above order
- major experience factors
- interest mortality taxes
- direct sales costs all other expenses persistency
- aggregation reinsurance changes in methodology
- model req defines min expenses w/ 3 option approaches
- approach must be used for all policy forms during certification year
- Fully Allocated Unit expenses
- Marginally Accocated Unit Expenses
- similar to fully but excluded corp overhead adn general adv
- GRET
- marginal only to used if > GRET
- GRET can only be used if > marginal (in aggregate)
- can always use fully allocated as minimum
- cannot project favorable trends into future
- Illustration Actuary needs to certify scale
- scale has not changed since last certification and experience doesn't warrant changes OR
- scale has changed since issue only to extent chagnes are reasonably consistent w/ changes in exp assumptions underlying current disciplined scale OR
- currently payable scale has been made less favorable to PO since last certification and change is more than current experience would necessitate
- Illustration Actuary should certify annually
- and for newly introduced forms before new policy form is illustrated
- certification should contain
- for business issued in last 5 years, if currently payable scale as been reduced since last cert for reasons unrelated to exp changes
- statement as to whether inconsistency between illustrated non-guar elements for new policies adn similar inforce policies
- statemetn whether illustrated non-guar elements for new and inforce pols consistent w/ non-guar element amts actually credited or charged to smae or similar forms
- statement as to choice of expense assumptions
-
Copyright © 2004 Steve Welander.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document
under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2
or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation;
with no Invariant Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.
A copy of the license is included in the section entitled
'GNU Free Documentation License'.